|
Get this: King of Pork John Murtha, the 19-term Democratic congressman from
western Pennsylvania, now wants to welcome a flood of Guantanamo Bay jihadists
into his district. I don't want to hear a single word of protestation from the
constituents who put this money-grubbing, security-undermining fool back into
office. As you vote, so shall you reap.
Murtha audaciously expressed his hope to house Gitmo detainees after
President Barack Obama circulated his draft executive order to shut the facility
down by the end of the year. "Sure, I'd take 'em," Murtha glibly retorted.
"They're no more dangerous in my district than in Guantanamo." Murtha blustered
that there was "no reason not to put 'em in prisons in the United States and
handle them the way they would handle any other prisoners."
Before we unpack all that ignorant nonsense, let us pause to illuminate
Murtha's motives. He is driven neither by a warped sense of patriotic duty nor
by misguided human rights compassion for al-Qaida foot soldiers. No, what fuels
him is unabashed greed and a lifelong edifice complex. The money-grubbing
Murtha, you see, just can't wait to snatch up federal tax dollars to build a new
maximum security prison for the Gitmo gang — no doubt with his name and face
plastered all over it. Welcome to the John Murtha Jihadist Correctional
Facility.
Forget about the increased risk Murtha would subject his district to by
volunteering it as a highly visible terror target. Forget about the disgusting
affront this pork grab poses to the families of those who died on United Flight
93 — which 9/11 terrorists crashed in Shanksville, Pa., represented by none
other than Murtha at the time. There's a shining prison on a hill to be built,
and Murtha will sell out his neighbors' safety to make sure it's built on
his hill.
Murtha's got logs to roll and wheels to grease. National security is an
impediment, not an imperative. Would you expect anything less from the shameless
politician caught on tape in the 1980s Abscam congressional bribery scandal
mulling payoffs from FBI agents posing as Arab sheiks? ("How much money we
talking about," Murtha asked one of the bagmen. "You know, we do business for a
while, maybe I'll be interested, maybe I won't.")
Murtha's contempt for the people he serves should surprise no one. This is
the man who called his own voters "rednecks" and who has refused to back down
from his smears of the exonerated Marines who served in Haditha, Iraq, as
"cold-blooded" murderers. This is the man who denies that we are combating
al-Qaida terrorists in Iraq. This is the man who lives in a fantasy world where
re-deploying American soldiers to Okinawa is a viable defense plan.
Murtha can't see any reason for keeping Gitmo detainees from flooding our
regular prisons and preventing them from exploiting our civilian court system,
because he is willfully blind and stone stupid.
John Murtha, meet Lynne Stewart. She's the disgraced lawyer convicted last
year of abetting her terrorist client — 1993 World Trade Center bombing/NY
landmark bombing mastermind Omar Abdel-Rahman. Stewart helped smuggle coded
messages of Islamic violence from the imprisoned sheik to outside followers in
violation of an explicit pledge to abide by her client's court-ordered
isolation.
While Rahman's court-appointed translator conveyed the message during prison
visits, Stewart made "covering noises," including shaking a water jar and
tapping on the table. A draft fatwa was discovered in Stewart's office; she also
signaled Rahman's wishes to his jihadist organization in an interview with
Reuters news service. The publication of those comments ushered in a new wave of
bombing attacks by Rahman's previously dormant terrorist outfit. The left-wing
radical Stewart remains unrepentant and clings to her belief that the 9/11
terrorist attacks were an "armed struggle."
Now, imagine a traitorous bleeding-heart Stewart assigned to each and every
one of the 250-odd Gitmo detainees. Imagine the risk of similar jailhouse
collaborations to innocent men, women and children at home and abroad. Imagine
the three-ring, O.J.-like circuses these trials will bring to your backyards.
It's easy if you try.
Prosecuting suspected terrorists like petty thieves or drug dealers is
fraught with peril. The Democrats have learned nothing from the failed law
enforcement strategies of the feckless Clinton era. Confiscated al-Qaida
training manuals have revealed that recruits are instructed in how to manipulate
the Western legal system if they are captured.
Affording accused al-Qaida operatives the Sixth Amendment right to a public
trial threatens to compromise classified information necessary to prosecute
future terrorist trials. Other rights guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment — the
right to subpoena witnesses and compel them to testify, the right to an attorney
— can interfere with interrogations of captured suspected al-Qaida agents. And
while the lives of those directly involved in, say, a mob trial might be
endangered, the entire nation may be at risk if we allow suspected members of a
terrorist network to engage in the discovery process and in privileged
communications with attorney-abettors.
Who will be accountable when these prosecutions run amok? When convicted
jihadists wreak bloody havoc from behind bars? And when Gitmo recidivists wage
war anew once released?
John Murtha doesn't give a damn. Do you?
Michelle Malkin is author of "Unhinged: Exposing Liberals Gone Wild." Her
e-mail address is malkinblog@gmail.com.
COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.
|