About Me

Name: BCORIG
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

The Person In Whittier

The person in Whittier:
She was implanted by an unknown fertility clinic, apparently, because she didn't want embryos from a In Vitro efforts to "go to waste".

Under existing statutes (there are none, actually) there is nothing anyone in HealthCare can do to change someone's mind when it comes to issues of life.

Ethics is variously defined as a set of moral principles, a theory or system of moral values or the principles of conduct governing an individual or a group.
 
In Bioethics there are various principles that often conflict. The ones that apply here are
Sanctity of Life
Autonomy (self determined choice)
Informed Consent - the patient has the right to know the benefits and burdens of a treatment
Decision Making Capacity
 
Sanctity of Life and Autonomy clash here: Is ending the life of some or most of the embryos ethical? The MDs at Kaiser Bellflower (I know them personally, they are competent caring people) likely tried to convince the mother to terminate some of the pregnancies but you cannot do anything without the permission of the patient (Autonomy). There was no ethics board because In Vitro Fertilization  procedures are a cash and carry procedure. Kaiser doesn't do them but we (nor anyone) cannot turn away anyone who shows up for care once it is done - no matter how many pregnancies. As stated above, there are no statutes to forbid or limit the number of pregnancies.
 
Informed Consent - the MDs certainly told her what she (and her children) was potentially in for.
Decision Making Capacity - was she crazy for doing this? The only way to keep her from getting implanted with 8 was to
1. Have whoever implanted her before she got to Kaiser (the IVF provider) refuse (and not get paid - fat chance) 
or  
2. Declare her insane and incapable of making an informed decision.
 
Is bringing them to term where they will certainly have ongoing (expensive) health issues that will continue to absorb resources (thereby denying or delaying such resources) ethical? This seems to be the major issue most ethicists (in the press) are concentrating on.
 
Now that you've pinned me down, what do I think?
8 embryos should not have been implanted - this is excessive and puts everyone's life in danger. Such an act threatens Sanctity of Life and hence is unethical. However, once the pregnancies were established the same Principle applies and the others kick in. You have to deliver and care for them the best you can.  
 
There is still a conflict here because what do you do with the embryos? If you dispose of them, that violates Sanctity of Life, assuming one believes that is when life begins.

My head hurts.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive